If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
is 5g harmful for humans and the environment (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. cell phone radiation would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.